Peer Review Policy

DMII 2027 employs a double-anonymized (double-blind) peer review process, in which the identities of both authors and reviewers are concealed from each other

Review Process:

• Upon submission, each paper undergoes an initial screening for scope alignment, formatting compliance, and plagiarism check.

• Papers that pass the initial screening are assigned to at least three independent reviewers with relevant expertise.

• Reviewers are allotted four weeks to complete their reviews. The overall review period from submission to final decision is approximately 8-10 weeks.

Review Criteria:

1. Is the topic of this paper within the scope of the conference's call for papers?

2. Does the manuscript present original ideas, findings, methods, or applications that make a meaningful contribution to the field?

3. Does the manuscript provide a clear and significant theoretical contribution to the relevant research area?

4. Does the manuscript demonstrate sufficient novelty or innovation in its research problem, approach, methodology, or findings?

5. Are the research methods appropriate, clearly described, scientifically sound, and correctly applied?

6. Are the results adequately analyzed and discussed? Are the conclusions supported by the evidence presented?

7. Is the manuscript clearly written, logically organized, and presented in a manner that is understandable to its intended readership?

8. Does the manuscript provide an adequate, relevant, and up-to-date review of the related literature? Are the cited works appropriately discussed and referenced?

9. Does the manuscript follow appropriate ethical guidelines, including requirements relating to research integrity, authorship, conflicts of interest, data use, and citation practices, where applicable?

Revision Policy:

• Both minor and major revisions are accepted.

• Authors of papers receiving a minor revision decision are allotted two weeks to submit their revised manuscript.

• Authors of papers receiving a major revision decision are allotted four weeks for revisions.

• All revised submissions are re-reviewed by the original reviewers to ensure that all concerns have been adequately addressed.

Quality Assurance:

• To maintain quality, at least two positive reviews are required to approve a paper for acceptance.

• All works not in accordance with these standards will be removed from the publication if malpractice is revealed at any time, even after publication.