Peer Review Policy

DMII 2027 employs a double-anonymized (double-blind) peer review process, in which the identities of both authors and reviewers are concealed from each other

Review Process:

• Upon submission, each paper undergoes an initial screening for scope alignment, formatting compliance, and plagiarism check.

• Papers that pass the initial screening are assigned to at least three independent reviewers with relevant expertise.

• Reviewers are allotted four weeks to complete their reviews. The overall review period from submission to final decision is approximately 8-10 weeks.

Review Criteria:

• Originality and novelty

• Scientific soundness and significance

• Quality of presentation

• Clarity of English expression

• Reproducibility of claims and experiments

Revision Policy:

• Both minor and major revisions are accepted.

• Authors of papers receiving a minor revision decision are allotted two weeks to submit their revised manuscript.

• Authors of papers receiving a major revision decision are allotted four weeks for revisions.

• All revised submissions are re-reviewed by the original reviewers to ensure that all concerns have been adequately addressed.

Quality Assurance:

• To maintain quality, at least two positive reviews are required to approve a paper for acceptance.

• All works not in accordance with these standards will be removed from the publication if malpractice is revealed at any time, even after publication.